Home »opinion »editorial »Premier’s election ...
  • Small - Large
  • |
  • Print
  • |
  • Email
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • Jun 22, 2012 - 7:34 AM
  • |
  • |
  • Report a Typo or Correction

Premier’s election threat childish

The minority Ontario government’s threat to go to the polls if the NDP joined the Progressive Conservatives to pass any more budget changes ahead of Wednesday’s final vote was childish, to say the least.
The spring deal between the NDP and Liberals had an amended 2012 provincial budget pass second reading before going to committee. The NDP successfully pushed for the document to include a two per cent tax on those earning over $500,000 and agreed to let the budget pass into law instead of joining the PCs in defeating it, triggering an election.
In committee, the NDP worked with the PC to defeat budget schedules ahead of Wednesday’s final vote on the budget overall, including labour arbitration for police, firefighters, essential hospital staff and the Toronto Transit commission. These changes had the Ontario government threatening to call an election ahead of the third reading of the budget on Wednesday. This would let voters have their say on the budget.
In the fall 2011 election, 49 per cent of voters marked an ‘x’. That’s not exactly a good turnout, and shows more of an indifference to provincial politics, than the deep desire to listen to stump speeches. Threatening to go to the voters on the budget is equal to children threatening to tell mom or dad that their sibling was involved in some minor infraction. Minority governments are supposed to work with those in opposition to best govern. The Liberals seemed to have forgotten that they no longer command the majority of votes in parliament, and that the opposition parties are doing exactly what they’re supposed to do - keep the government in check.
The budget did go to the final vote Wednesday, and the NDP reserved its vote, letting the document pass final reading as agreed upon in the spring. It was a trumped up crisis adverted. The provincial Liberals seem to have learned a lesson, though and voiced intent to work with the opposition on other issues in the future. This is good. This type of ‘bullying’ as the NDP termed the recent government threats, has no place in politics.



  • Small - Large
  • |
  • Print
  • |
  • Email
  • |
  • |
More Stories

Editorial

Taxing ganja

Police from five different units of the OPP busted a couple of middle-aged people with possession of 24 grams of weed and a pipe in Foots Bay last week. The street value of the pot was estimated to be about $240. We’re guessing that it cost a lot more than a couple of hundred bucks for officers from the Bracebridge detachment of the Ontario Provincial Police, the OPP West Parry Sound Crime Unit, the OPP Community Drug Action Team, the OPP Organized Crime Enforcement Bureau Drug Enforcement Unit and the OPP K-9 to execute the search warrant. It’s likely the search warrant alone cost more to apply for and obtain. There are levels of bureaucracy to go through, and we all know that bureaucracy is costly at every level. We don’t blame the police for wasting our money, it’s not their fault. They don’t choose which laws they’re going to enforce – that’s a job for the people making the laws. And it’s time for them to give their heads a shake. Prohibition doesn’t work; never has, never will. Sixty-five per cent of Canadians want marijuana laws changed. The earliest remains of human settlement show evidence of recreational drugs. Gorillas and apes have a taste for hallucinogens and stimulants. Primates want to get high and no government is going to stop them. Certainly there are social problems that go along with the abuse of any drug, whether it’s vodka or marijuana. Criminalizing the huge numbers of Canadians who want to smoke some herb doesn’t help solve those problems. Making headway with drug abuse will only happen when it’s treated as a health issue, rather than a legal one. We recognize that not everyone will agree with us; we expect some people to disagree vehemently. But social policy aside, this is a financial issue. It’s not just a moral issue, it’s a matter of dollars and cents. Or is that common sense? As Muskoka Algonquin Healthcare tells us, it’s a fairy tale to imagine that we will have the same level of health care services at our hospitals with an aging population; as the numbers of people requiring help from our food banks rapidly increase; as our municipality struggles to make due with significantly less funds from the province; and as our police services are straining at the seams, in part because they are dealing with more and more people with mental health issues. Something’s got to give.